U.S. vs. Navarro, 7 Phil. 713

It would seem that the fault or carelessness of the injured party, which would break the relation of the felony committed and the resulting injury, must  have its origin from his malicious act or omission (U.S. vs. Navarro, 7 Phil. 713), as when the injured party had a desire to increase the criminal liability of his assailant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

LAWYERS LEAGUE FOR A BETTER PHILIPPINES vs. AQUINO G.R. No. 73748

OSG vs Ayala Land G.R. NO. 177056, SEPTEMBER 18, 2009

Floresca v. Philex Mining GR L-30642., 30 April 1985 (136 SCRA 142)