Aquino III vs COMELEC GR 189793
Aquino III
V. Comelec
Apr. 7, 2010
Issue:
This is a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition under Rule 65 of the Rules of
Court. Petitioners Senator Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III and Mayor Jesse Robredo
seek the nullification as unconstitutional of Republic Act No. 9716, entitled
“An Act Reapportioning the Composition of the First (1st) and Second (2nd)
Legislative Districts in the Province of Camarines Sur and Thereby Creating a
New Legislative District From Such Reapportionment.”
Republic Act No. 9716 originated from
House Bill No. 4264, and was signed into law by President Gloria Macapagal
Arroyo on 12 October 2009. It took effect on 31 October 2009 creating an
additional legislative district for the Province of Camarines Sur by
reconfiguring the existing first and second legislative districts of the
province.
The Province of Camarines Sur was
estimated to have a population of 1,693,821,2 distributed among four (4)
legislative districts. Following the enactment of Republic Act No. 9716, the
first and second districts of Camarines Sur were reconfigured in order to
create an additional legislative district for the province. Hence, the first
district municipalities of Libmanan, Minalabac, Pamplona, Pasacao, and San
Fernando were combined with the second district municipalities of Milaor and
Gainza to form a new second legislative district.
District |
Municipalities/Cities |
Population |
|
1st District |
Del Gallego |
|
176,383 |
2nd District |
Libmanan |
San Fernando |
276,777 |
3rd District (formerly 2nd District) |
Naga |
Camaligan |
439,043 |
4th District (formerly 3rd District) |
Caramoan |
Sangay |
372,548 |
5th District (formerly 4th District) |
Iriga |
Buhi |
429,070 |
Petitioners
contend that the reapportionment introduced by Republic Act No. 9716, runs
afoul of the explicit constitutional standard that requires a minimum
population of two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) for the creation of a
legislative district. Petitioners rely on Section 5(3), Article VI of the 1987
Constitution as basis for the cited 250,000 minimum population standard. The
provision reads:
(3) Each legislative district shall comprise, as far as practicable, contiguous,
compact, and adjacent territory. Each city with a population of at least two
hundred fifty thousand, or each province, shall have at least one
representative.
The petitioners claim that the
reconfiguration by Republic Act No. 9716 of the first and second districts of
Camarines Sur is unconstitutional, because the proposed first district will end
up with a population of less than 250,000 or only 176,383.
Issue:
w/n a population of 250,000 is an indispensable constitutional requirement for
the creation of a new legislative district in a province?
Held:
We deny the petition.
Ruling:
There is no specific provision in the Constitution that fixes a 250,000 minimum
population that must compose a legislative district.
The use by the subject provision of a comma to separate the phrase “each city
with a population of at least two hundred fifty thousand” from the phrase “or
each province” point to no other conclusion than that the 250,000 minimum
population is only required for a city, but not for a province.
Plainly read, Section 5(3) of the Constitution
requires a 250,000
minimum population only for a city to be entitled to a representative, but not
so for a province.
Apropos for discussion is the provision of the Local Government
Code on the creation of a province which, by virtue of and upon creation, is
entitled to at least a legislative district. Thus, Section 461 of the Local
Government Code states:
Requisites for Creation. –
(a) A province may be created if it has an average annual income, as certified
by the Department of Finance, of not less than Twenty million pesos
(P20,000,000.00) based on 1991 constant prices and either of the following
requisites:
(i) a contiguous territory of at least two thousand (2,000) square
kilometers, as certified by the Lands Management Bureau; or
(ii) a population of not less than two hundred fifty thousand (250,000)
inhabitants as certified by the National Statistics Office.
Notably, the requirement of population is not an indispensable
requirement, but is merely an alternative addition to the indispensable income
requirement.
Comments
Post a Comment